EXW，即EX Works，EX是Exit的缩写，这里指大门出口的意思，WORKS是工厂的意思，EXW即工厂交货。它指卖方负有在其所在地即车间（workshop）、工厂（works）、仓库（warehouse）等把备妥的货物交付给买方的责任，但通常不负责将货物装上买方准备的车辆或办理货物结关。买方承担自卖方的所在地将货物运至预期的目的地的全部费用和风险。

EX Works：(of a price, value, etc) excluding the cost of delivery from the factory and sometimes excluding the commission or profit of the distributor or retailer 工厂交货价的(地)

EXW是卖方承担责任最小的术语。买方必须承担在卖方所在地受领货物的全部费用和风险。若双方希望在起运时卖方负责装载货物并承担装载货物的全部费用和风险，则须在销售合同中明确写明。

买方的义务包括：

l 支付价款 Payment Of The Price

l 许可证、其他许可和手续Licenses, Other Permits And Procedures

l 受领货物 Taking Delivery

l 风险转移 Risk Transfer

l 费用划分Payment Distribution

l 通知卖方Notify The Seller

l 货物检验Cargo Survey

卖方的义务包括：

l 提供符合合同规定的货物Supply the goods in conformity with the contract

l 许可证、其他许可和手续Licenses, Other Permits And Procedures

l 交货Deliver The Goods

l 风险转移 Risk Transfer

l 费用划分Payment Distribution

l 通知买方Notify The Buyer

l 查对、包装、标记Check,Package,Mark

参考双语例句：

Although the term EXW would better reflect this if the seller's obligations have been extended to include loading, it was decided to retain the traditional principle seller's minimum obligation According with the terms of the term EXW That they can be used for cases where the seller does not want to take any liability for the loading Product.

虽然该术语 EXW 将更好地反映这一点，如果卖方的义务已扩大到包括装货，它决定保留最小的传统原则卖方的义务据的条款的术语EXW他们可以使用的情况下，卖方不希望采取任何责任加载产品。

Prior to ex-works, equipment is subject to optimal design and production, as well as 72-hour running test as required by the customers, which can meet the special requirements of different customers.

设备在出厂前均根据客户需求，经过最佳优化设计、生产制造、72小时运转测试，保证满足不同客户的品质与特殊要求。

The Court of Cassation made no reference either to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods or to the Incoterm “ex works” and merely noted that, according to the appeal judgement, the place of delivery of the goods under article 5, paragraph 1 (b), of the Brussels 1 Regulation was clear from a special provision of the sales contract between the parties, which specified the place of delivery as Avallon.

最高法院既没有援引《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》，也没援引《通则》中的“工厂交货”，而只是指出，根据上诉判决，《布鲁塞尔条例1》第5条第1款(b)项规定的货物交付地点应不受各方之间指定阿瓦隆为交货地点的销售合同的特殊规定限制。